Compliance — position paper
Why can Clinical evaluation be an Anti-Corruption Weapon?
The importance of Compliance within Clinical Evaluation
Recently, the healthcare system has been attempting to »clean-up its act« and much attention is being brought to corruption and bribery. Medical Device and Pharmaceutical organizations are being targeted by anti-corruption and anti-bribery officials, followed closely by Global Policy reinforcements (European laws, Bribery Act, Sunshine Act…). Serious investigations have already hit major and smaller businesses, forcing Life Science companies to establish global guidelines and standards to monitor their interactions with healthcare professionals.
London conference
During the last International Medical Device Industry Compliance Conference held in London, the topic of corruption was discussed. In fact, corruption is still very widely spread in the industry and many CEO’s have demonstrated their techniques to best comply with the regulations in place —internal auditing, risk assessment program, compliance departments…
A KPI framework was presented by David Wysocky, Director at PwC, which demonstrated the importance of R&D in compliance and stated that »informative/accurate KPIs can only be obtained through a combination of policies, processes, data and support«.
Denise Botticelli, VP, Associate General Counsel & Secretary at Edwards explained the importance of an »on-going operation cycle of transparency«. This very explicit cycle begins with clinical evaluation (thanks to monitoring, data and updates); this demonstrates the importance of clinical evaluation as it represents the basis for a transparency cycle.
ClinSearch’s point of view
Relationship with healthcare professional
In order to develop a new product, the help, advice and knowledge of healthcare professionals is essential. However, this relationship must be purely professional, corruption and bribery free and is now strictly regulated. A good relationship must be put in place between the two parties meaning: a scientific, rational, objective and documented relationship. It must be mutually beneficial while still respecting the rules of compliance.
Clinical evaluation: the legitimate reason to collaborate between industrials and Health Care Professionals
The question is: how can manufacturers comply with these requirements?
The answer lies in Clinical Evaluation. Innovation and product development is an act of validation; it promotes company value and healthcare technology. It should bring value to the manufacturer, the distributor and the healthcare professional who worked on the project at each step.
A thorough and detailed analysis can under no circumstances be corrupt. When manufacturers are in relations with physicians and distributors, everything must be documented and transparent. Clinical evaluations allow to have documented research thus proving the quality and performance of the innovation and its compliance. Outsourcing this research to compliance committed companies further allows lowering the risk of internal corruption.
Be ahead
Your company’s reputation is at stake; anti-corruption and anti-bribery officials are looking deeper into these matters especially in the United States. Clinical Research is still just emerging as a tool and a weapon against corruption; it is still poorly used as it should. Major companies have now started to acknowledge this and are looking into increasing their level of clinical research. Compliance departments are developed; »external« companies are used for their professional know-how and to avoid corruption (outsourcing lowers the risk of civil and/or criminal prosecutions on your company). Be amongst the first to follow this trend and demonstrate the values of your product and company.
How to increase sales?
The best way to ally market growth and compliance is to develop innovative technology or products with healthcare professionals (HCPs). Clinical evaluation is still not commonly used throughout the industry to validate and promote the efficiency of an innovation or product. However, it is undoubtedly the best way to demonstrate the benefits brought by your innovation. Clinical evaluation should be your first marketing decision. There is no alternative to enter the market durably.
It is important to make a clear cut between marketing and clinical evaluation. Clinical evaluation MUST NOT be corrupted for marketing purposes. However, a well performed clinical evaluation is always useful for marketing purposes: clinical evaluation demonstrates the performance and safety of the product thanks to the use of data.
The best marketing tool for a medical product is a proven security and performance
News
Morning Read: Non-profit designing free Wi-Fi architecture for hospitals >> Read
Managing retinal vein occlusion >> Read
Let Me Die on the Prairie by Frances Jane Crosby Van Alstyne >> Read
Publication: Volume 16, number 4 (Stevenson). Study found that no conclusive results can be provided on the cost-effectiveness of four non-invasive tests for liver fibrosis [the Enhanced Liver Fibrosis Test, FibroTest and FibroMAX and transient elastography (FibroScan)] in patients suspected of having alcohol-related liver disease. >> Read
Top headlines from HIMSS2012 (Tuesday edition) >> Read
Incidence of diabetic retinopathy in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus attending the Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Service for Wales: retrospective analysis >> Read
Publication: Volume 16, number 3 (Hockenhull). Report finds that whilst some interventions targeted at mental health populations to reduce violence are well supported by the evidence a scattergun approach in the research literature provides little firm evidence for the majority of interventions. Evidence shows small-to-moderate effects for cognitive behavioural therapy for psychological interventions, and larger effects for atypical antipsychotic drugs. >> Read
How the NHS measures up to other health systems >> Read
Publication: Volume 16, number 5 (Ara). Although orlistat, sibutramine and rimonabant are all effective at reducing weight and body mass index and, compared with placebo, are all cost-effective, both sibutramine and rimonabant have been withdrawn because of safety concerns relating to potential treatment-induced fatal adverse events. >> Read
Peter John Fenton >> Read
Publication: Volume 16, number 6 (Reeves). The verteporfin photodynamic therapy cohort study found that treatment and follow-up were much less frequent in routine clinical practice than in research trials and the cost-effectiveness was similar to the highest previous estimate. >> Read
Frederick Valentine Flynn >> Read